MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200104664 · doi:10.4000/memini.1842

Le narrateur « désinvolte » ou l’écriture en trompe-l’œil dans le Livre du Chevalier errant de Thomas de Saluces

2021· article· fr· W4200104664 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Madeleine Jeay

Bibliographic record

VenueMemini · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les guillemets qui accompagnent l’adjectif « désinvolte » du titre laissent pressentir une désinvolture plus apparente que réelle, qui pourrait n’être, après tout, qu’un trompe-l’œil, un des nombreux que révèle l’écriture du Chevalier errant. Ce qualificatif s’est imposé à moi à la lecture du commentaire du narrateur expliquant de façon cavalière pourquoi il passe du vers à la prose : « Meshuy je vueil en prose en part compter / Car il m’ennuye de tant versifier ». De toute évidence, la remar...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeminiSame topicMedieval European Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207