Analisis Likes to Subscriber Ratio Youtube Pada 5 Brand Sepatu Terkenal di Dunia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
YouTube adalah sebuah situs web berbagi video yang dibuat oleh tiga mantan karyawan Paypal, yaitu Steve Chen, Chad Hurley dan Jawed Karim pada Februari 2005. Situs web ini memungkinkan pengguna mengunggah, menonton, dan berbagi video. Video pertama yang diunggah di situs ini berjudul "Me at the zoo" yang menayangkan salah satu pendiri YouTube saat berada di Kebun binatang San Diego. YouTube juga menjadi salah satu aplikasi media sosial terbesar yang sering digunakan untuk melakukan pemasaran suatu barang oleh brand ternama. Adapun 5 brand sepatu terkenal di dunia yang sudah memanfaatkan Youtube sebagai media pemasaran, yaitu : Vans, Adidas, Nike, New Balance, dan Converse. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan yaitu untuk menghitung kredibilitas dari akun YouTube 5 Brand Sepatu Terkenal di Dunia. Metode yang digunakan untuk penelitian ini yaitu metode eksploratif kuantitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa brand sepatu New Balance mendapatkan peringkat pertama dan memiliki kredibilitas performa akun yang terbaik.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".