HSDFinder: A BLAST-Based Strategy for Identifying Highly Similar Duplicated Genes in Eukaryotic Genomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gene duplication is an important evolutionary mechanism capable of providing new genetic material for adaptive and nonadaptive evolution. However, bioinformatics tools for identifying duplicate genes are often limited to the detection of paralogs in multiple species or to specific types of gene duplicates, such as retrocopies. Here, we present a user-friendly, BLAST-based web tool, called HSDFinder, which can identify, annotate, categorize, and visualize highly similar duplicate genes (HSDs) in eukaryotic nuclear genomes. HSDFinder includes an online heatmap plotting option, allowing users to compare HSDs among different species and visualize the results in different Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway functional categories. The external software requirements are BLAST, InterProScan, and KEGG. The utility of HSDFinder was tested on various model eukaryotic species, including Chlamydomonas reinhardtii , Arabidopsis thaliana , Oryza sativa , and Zea mays as well as the psychrophilic green alga Chlamydomonas sp. UWO241, and was proven to be a practical and accurate tool for gene duplication analyses. The web tool is free to use at http://hsdfinder.com . Documentation and tutorials can be found via the GitHub: https://github.com/zx0223winner/HSDFinder .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".