MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200112621 · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-21-00170.1

Virtual Social Events: An Integral Component of Recruitment in the New Era of Graduate Medical Education

2021· article· en· W4200112621 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Graduate Medical Education · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiversity and Career in Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViewpointsInterviewProcess (computing)Component (thermodynamics)RubricGraduate medical educationQuality (philosophy)Virtual communityVirtual patient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the inaugural virtual interview season of 2020–2021, residency and fellowship applicants were charged with evaluating the educational opportunities and quality of life at training programs without ever having visited them. Trainees quickly recognized how in-person social events, particularly the pre-interview dinner, played a role in evaluating how well they might fit in with a program.1–7 In previous years, such opportunities offered applicants and program representatives a chance to unwind and enjoy meaningful communion in a semi-structured environment.With little time to prepare, most residency programs replaced their in-person social events with virtual events hosted on video conferencing platforms.1,3,4,7–11 While virtual social events were unable to fully recreate the in-person experience, it appears virtual interviewing will largely continue in 2021–2022, as 10 medical specialties and 14 individual programs have already made commitments to do so at the time of this manuscript submission.12 Thus, optimizing virtual social events will be vital to improving the interview process going forward.The graduate medical education (GME) community has yet to see published outcomes data or written best practices regarding the creation of virtual social events. The intent of this article is to share the firsthand experiences and insights of the coauthors, both of whom were applicants in the 2020–2021 virtual interview season. The viewpoints expressed within this article have been echoed by applicant colleagues matched to a diverse collection of specialties, including pediatrics, radiology, plastic surgery, internal medicine–pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, and psychiatry, as well as by mentors in program leadership from pediatrics and radiology.Finding creative alternatives to pre-interview dinners during a pandemic was challenging.13–16 An engaging virtual social event required a higher degree of planning than the traditional in-person social event. In the end, structure was the key ingredient for us in creating virtual social events that were worthwhile for applicants.Online social gatherings require definitive endpoints. We advocate for an ideal length of 30 to 60 minutes based on our own experience and recommendations from the business literature, which were informed by the limits of adult attention spans.17,18 A virtual social event longer than an hour can become tedious, while any less than 30 minutes may jeopardize the opportunity for meaningful interactions.Due to time constraints, a strategic agenda is necessary. Disclosing it to applicants ahead of time frames the session and creates purpose. For example, trainees and applicants can simulate working with one another through virtual scavenger hunts or group icebreakers.9 These tools provide goal-oriented methods of becoming acquainted that are otherwise not achievable with videoconferencing.In the virtual space, question and answer (Q&A) sessions represent an invaluable tool but should be used with care.4 When an “applicant social” morphs into a full hour of Q&A, the session can become diluted with specific personal questions and content that may overlap during the interview day itself. Moreover, it's not very social. With extended Q&A, applicants don't get a chance to see the personalities of residents within the program as they might with one-on-one conversations. Rather, program leadership should engage attendees with Q&A during the latter portion of the meeting, allowing sufficient time for prospective trainees to participate interactively.During the 2020–2021 virtual interview season, medical students were often invited to attend virtual social events voluntarily.19 Yet many applicants can feel obligated to treat such “optional” activities as required. The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) does not have rules pertaining to virtual events (Ally Anderson, MA, written correspondence, April 12, 2021). And while the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) does not manage social events that occur throughout the Canadian residency recruitment season (Mary Gerges, written correspondence, April 9, 2021), they have instructed programs not to use “applicant attendance as a surrogate measure of program interest.”20During the 2020–2021 season, some programs emphasized their intentions by offering statements such as, “Your attendance will not be recorded, nor will it affect your ranking.” We suggest that programs pledge their transparency along these lines by clearly conveying the purpose, agenda, and optional nature of all virtual social events.One of the benefits of social events is that current trainees get to know the applicants and vice versa.8,9 To gain valuable insight about the applicants themselves, we recommend programs reserve these sessions for social interactions only, rather than for didactic information regarding the program. Hearing applicants' personal stories allows the program to show interest in their individuality and gives voice to applicants of all backgrounds. Often, dialogue is more fluid in an intimate environment, similar to speed dating or small group breakout rooms.1 These afford an opportunity for applicants to show their personal sides while allowing programs to champion applicant inclusivity by giving voice to students of all backgrounds. Finally, current trainees can be powerful marketing agents for their programs and have the potential to play key roles during virtual social events. As near peers, they are often effective at connecting with applicants to explain the challenges and opportunities at their home institutions.4,21Recruitment in GME experienced a revolutionary paradigm shift in 2020 due to downstream effects of a global pandemic.22 Operating in a virtual space, programs were forced to innovate new strategies to optimize recruitment, including the creation of virtual social events. We believe virtual social events represent one facet of the new paradigm which could still be substantially improved, mostly by structuring the time with planned small group activities so that applicants and trainees can become better acquainted.Other potential changes could improve equity in the virtual social event experience, although they would require systemic changes by governing bodies. First, the NRMP could add to its Match Communication Code of Conduct a mandate that programs disclose the implications of applicant attendance at virtual social events. Such transparency is necessary to prevent misunderstanding and inequity of opportunity. In addition, the NRMP might consider asking programs to verify individual applicant acknowledgement of such transparency statements when scheduling their attendance at virtual social events.In response to the large volume of virtual social events in the 2020–2021 season, leadership within the Association of Pediatric Program Directors recommended that pediatric residency programs limit themselves to 2 virtual social events in the upcoming season to be more impactful, sustainable, and equitable.23 We suggest that other program director associations consider adopting similar practices.Virtual social events offer programs and applicants unique opportunities not afforded by the formal interview day. One such opportunity is to showcase departmental diversity, equity, and inclusion practices and policies with applicants. Virtual social events also contribute to a more equitable application experience, allowing applicants to connect with programs without the financial burden of travel. These events establish longitudinal communication between the applicant and program, representing a point of contact outside of the interview day. Finally, a more relaxed and intimate small group setting with trainees may make it easier for applicants to ask difficult questions or steer the discussion to topics of interest to them.As an optional component to the virtual interview season, we feel that virtual social events can be leveraged to achieve benefits greater than or equal to those derived from in-person social events. Additionally, the transition to virtual social events represents an opportunity to improve the transparency of optional events by mandating program disclosure regarding the implications of attendance. Finally, we feel these events are well-suited for programs to demonstrate to applicants their commitments to the vital domains of trainee equity, inclusion, and wellness.The authors would like to thank Darel Heitkamp, MD (@DarelHeitkamp) for his editorial assistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Graduate Medical EducationSame topicDiversity and Career in MedicineFrench-language works237,207