MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200114092 · doi:10.1145/3495535.3495538

Redline Atomic-Oxygen-Airglow Image Restoration for the VIOLET CubeSat Mission

2021· article· en· W4200114092 on OpenAlexafffund
Alex L. Voisine, Brent R. Petersen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersCanadian Space AgencyNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsAirglowCubeSatAtomic oxygenRemote sensingOxygenEnvironmental scienceAstrobiologyComputer scienceAstronomyPhysicsGeologySatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Spectral Airglow Structure Imager (SASI) is a mission on CubeSat NB’s VIOLET satellite, and it is imaging the 630 nm redline atomic oxygen airglow in the ionosphere at altitudes of 300-400 km. The image acquisition conditions of VIOLET make it susceptible to significant degradation primarily due to rotational blurring. A method of deconvolution by ring extraction and linearization using Richardson-Lucy methods for rotational blurring is presented to minimize the rotational blurring in the system. Interpolation by means of splicing and specific pixel deconvolutions are discussed to increase image quality after deconvolution. Boundary conditions for pre-processing to handle corner degradation due to the nature of rotational blurring are also discussed. Preliminary results show effective deconvolution of rotationally blurred images, currently resulting in SSIM indexes approaching 0.50.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207