Online Monitoring of Power Converter Degradation Using Deep Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Power semiconductor devices in the power converters used for motor drives are susceptible to wear-out and failure, especially when operated in harsh environments. Therefore, detection of degradation of power devices is crucial for ensuring the reliable performance of power converters. In this paper, a deep learning approach for online classification of the health states of the snubber resistors in the Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs) in a three-phase Brushless DC (BLDC) motor drive is proposed. The method can locate one out of the six IGBTs experiencing a snubber resistor degradation problem by measuring the voltage waveforms of the three shunt resistors using voltage sensors. The range of the degradation of the snubber resistors for successful classification is also investigated. The off-the-shelf deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture ResNet50 is used for transfer learning to determine which snubber resistor has degraded. The dataset for evaluating the above classification scheme of IGBT degradation is obtained by measuring the shunt voltage waveforms with varying snubber resistance and reference current. Then, the three-phase voltage waveforms are converted into greyscale images and RGB spectrogram images, which are later fed into the deep CNN. Experiments are carried out on the greyscale image dataset and the spectrogram image dataset using four-fold cross-validation. The results show that the proposed scheme can classify seven classes (one class for normal condition and six classes for abnormal condition in one of the six IGBTs in a three-phase BLDC drive) with over 95% average accuracy within a specific range of snubber resistance. Using grayscale images and using spectrogram-based RGB images yields similar accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".