MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200125790 · doi:10.3390/machines10010025

Data Analytics for Noise Reduction in Optical Metrology of Reflective Planar Surfaces

2021· article· en· W4200125790 on OpenAlexaff
Cody Berry, Marcos de Sales Guerra Tsuzuki, Ahmad Barari

Bibliographic record

VenueMachines · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetrologyNoise (video)PlanarNoise reductionComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)AnalyticsOpticsComputer visionData miningComputer graphics (images)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On-line data collection from the manufactured parts is an essential element in Industry 4.0 to monitor the production’s health, which required strong data analytics. The optical metrology-based inspection of highly reflective parts in a production line, such as parts with metallic surfaces, is a difficult challenge. As many on-line inspection paradigms require the use of optical sensors, this reflectivity can lead to large amounts of noise, rendering the scan inaccurate. This paper discusses a method for noise reduction and removal in datapoints resulting from scanning the reflective planar surfaces. Utilizing a global statistic-based iterative approach, noise is gradually removed from the dataset at increasing percentages. The change in the standard deviation of point-plane distances is examined, and an optimal amount of noisy data is removed to reduce uncertainty in representing the workpiece. The developed algorithm provides a fast and efficient method for noise reduction in optical coordinate metrology and scanning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMachinesSame topicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology TechniquesFrench-language works237,207