MRI Knee Domain Translation for Unsupervised Segmentation By CycleGAN (data from Osteoarthritis initiative (OAI))
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate quantification of bone and cartilage features is the key to efficient management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Bone and cartilage tissues can be accurately segmented from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data using supervised Deep Learning (DL) methods. DL training is commonly conducted using large datasets with expert-labeled annotations. DL models perform better if distributions of testing data (target domains) are close to those of training data (source domains). However, in practice, data distributions of images from different MRI scanners and sequences are different and DL models need to re-trained on each dataset separately. We propose a domain adaptation (DA) framework using the CycleGAN model for MRI translation that would aid in unsupervised MRI data segmentation. We have validated our pipeline on five scans from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) dataset. Using this pipeline, we translated TSE Fat Suppressed MRI sequences to pseudo-DESS images. An improved MaskRCNN (IMaskRCNN) instance segmentation network trained on DESS was used to segment cartilage and femoral head regions in TSE Fat Suppressed sequences. Segmentations of the I-MaskRCNN correlated well with approximated manual segmentation obtained from nearest DESS slices (DICE = 0.76) without the need for retraining. We anticipate this technique will aid in automatic unsupervised assessment of knee MRI using commonly acquired MRI sequences and save experts' time that would otherwise be required for manual segmentation.Clinical relevance- This technique paves the way to automatically convert one MRI sequence to its equivalent as if acquired by a different protocol or different magnet, facilitating robust, hardware-independent automated analysis. For example, routine clinically acquired knee MRI could be converted to high-resolution high-contrast images suitable for automated detection of cartilage defects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".