MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200128763 · doi:10.2196/34897

Correction: Reducing Intrusive Memories of Childhood Trauma Using a Visuospatial Intervention: Case Study in Iceland

2021· erratum· en· W4200128763 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Kristjana Þórarinsdóttir, Emily A. Holmes, Johann Hardarson, Unnur Héðinsdóttir, Marie Kanstrup, Laura Singh, Arna Hauksdóttir, Thorhildur Halldorsdottir, Berglind Guðmundsdóttir, Unnur Valdimarsdóttir, Edda Björk Þórðardóttir, Beau Gamble, Andri S. Björnsson

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2021
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAFA FörsäkringSwedish Collegium for Advanced StudyLupina FoundationSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungOak FoundationVetenskapsrådetNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)PsychologyCognitive psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a Visuospatial Intervention: Case Study in Iceland" (JMIR Form Res 2021;5(11):e29873) the authors noted eight errors.This is a non-peer-reviewed article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0070.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.523
Teacher spread0.398 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative ResearchSame topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207