MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200130598 · doi:10.3390/foundations1020022

Deep Learning on Synthesized Sensor Characteristics and Transmission Spectra Enabling MEMS-Based Spectroscopic Gas Analysis beyond the Fourier Transform Limit

2021· article· en· W4200130598 on OpenAlexaff
Samar Elaraby, Sherif M. Abuelenin, Adel Moussa, Yasser M. Sabry

Bibliographic record

VenueFoundations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersInformation Technology Industry Development Agency
KeywordsSpectrometerSpectral resolutionFourier transformSpectral lineFourier transform spectroscopyFourier transform infrared spectroscopyMiniaturizationResolution (logic)InfraredMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Computer scienceOpticsChemistryPhysicsNanotechnologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Miniaturized Fourier transform infrared spectrometers serve emerging market needs in many applications such as gas analysis. The miniaturization comes at the cost of lower performance than bench-top instrumentation, especially for the spectral resolution. However, higher spectral resolution is needed for better identification of the composition of materials. This article presents a convolutional neural network (CNN) for 3X resolution enhancement of the measured infrared gas spectra using a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer beyond the transform limit. The proposed network extracts a set of high-dimensional features from the input spectra and constructs high-resolution outputs by nonlinear mapping. The network is trained using synthetic transmission spectra of complex gas mixtures and simulated sensor non-idealities such as baseline drifts and non-uniform signal-to-noise ratio. Ten gases that are relevant to the natural and bio gas industry are considered whose mixtures suffer from overlapped features in the mid-infrared spectral range of 2000–4000 cm−1. The network results are presented for both synthetic and experimentally measured spectra using both bench-top and miniaturized MEMS spectrometers, improving the resolution from 60 cm−1 to 20 cm−1 with a mean square error down to 2.4×10−3 in the transmission spectra. The technique supports selective spectral analysis based on miniaturized MEMS spectrometers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoundationsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207