MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200135951 · doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.10.010

Prognostic markers in invasive bladder cancer: FGFR3 mutation status versus P53 and KI-67 expression: a multi-center, multi-laboratory analysis in 1058 radical cystectomy patients

2021· article· en· W4200135951 on OpenAlexafffund
Laura S. Mertens, Francesco Claps, Roman Mayr, Peter J. Boström, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Ellen C. Zwarthoff, Joost L. Boormans, Cheno Abas, Geert J.L.H. van Leenders, S. A. Gotz, Katrin Hippe, Simone Bertz, Y. Neuzillet, Joyce Sanders, Annegien Broeks, Dennis Peters, Michiel S. van der Heijden, Michael A.S. Jewett, Robert Stöhr, Alexandre R. Zlotta, Markus Eckstein, Yanish Soorojebally, Deric K. E. van der Schoot, Bernd Wullich, Maximilian Burger, Wolfgang Otto, François Radvanyi, Nanour Sirab, Damien Pouessel, Theodorus van der Kwast, Arndt Hartmann, Yair Lotan, Yves Allory, Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon, Bas W.G. van Rhijn

Bibliographic record

VenueUrologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersKWF KankerbestrijdingUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsCystectomyMedicineBladder cancerImmunohistochemistryStage (stratigraphy)Lymph nodeInternal medicineKi-67GastroenterologySingle CenterOncologyPathologyCancerUrologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueUrologic Oncology Seminars and Original InvestigationsSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207