MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200139386 · doi:10.1002/app.52054

Bio‐cleaned lignin‐based carbon fiber and its application in adsorptive water treatment

2021· article· en· W4200139386 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiawei Chen, Tanushree Ghosh, Cagri Ayranci, Tian Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdsorptionLigninMethylene blueFreundlich equationLangmuirLangmuir adsorption modelFiberMaterials scienceChemical engineeringActivated carbonChemistryNuclear chemistryCarbon fibersComposite materialOrganic chemistryCatalysisComposite numberPhotocatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although an agricultural byproduct, lignin can be a felicitous choice serving as a carbon fiber precursor upon bio‐cleaning with Pseudomonas fluorescence . In this study, carbon fiber produced from electrospun bio‐cleaned lignin (Bio‐KLB) was demonstrated to be a novel efficient adsorbent for methylene blue in wastewater treatment. Bio‐cleaning effectively changed lignin from un‐electrospinnable to easily‐electrospinnable by removing impurities. Bio‐KLB carbon fiber mats showed average fiber diameter of 278.95 ± 49.89 nm, and randomly dispersed fiber mats showed average elastic modulus of 1532.87 ± 439.63 MPa and tensile strength of 16.72 ± 5.21 MPa. Adsorption of methylene blue on Bio‐KLB carbon fibers was analyzed at pH = 9, where optimal adsorption and decent reusability were observed. Kinetic adsorption was fitted well with pseudo‐first‐order model while adsorption isotherms were fitted to both Langmuir and Freundlich models. The highest adsorption capacity was 548.65 mg/g based on Langmuir model. The results provide clear evidence that electrospun bio‐cleaned lignin‐based carbon fibers can be a strong alternative material for dye treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207