MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200139440 · doi:10.3917/tf.213.0225

Accueil et clinique de crise

2021· article· fr· W4200139440 on OpenAlex
Mathilde Meriaux, Stéphan Hendrick, Jennifer Denis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThérapie Familiale · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’accueil constitue l’amorce de tout processus thérapeutique. Cet instant fugace convoque les espoirs et les craintes des protagonistes de la relation de soin, mobilise les préjugés, amorce la dynamique transférentielle, provoque – ou pas – les résonances, et ouvre ou ferme les portes d’une possible rencontre. Malgré toute l’importance de ce premier instant qui balisera la rencontre, l’accueil fait relativement peu l’objet d’études approfondies. Notre recherche part de la question suivante : « Qu’est-ce qu’accueillir dans le champ de la santé mentale ? ». Elle vise à proposer une conceptualisation en explorant le sens donné par des professionnels au sein de services d’urgences psychiatriques. L’analyse par théorisation enracinée (Glaser et Strauss, 1967) a permis de dégager quatre catégories conceptuelles : (1) processus singulier ; (2) intentionnalité ; (3) entre je(u) ; (4) ritualisation de l’accueil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it