Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’accueil constitue l’amorce de tout processus thérapeutique. Cet instant fugace convoque les espoirs et les craintes des protagonistes de la relation de soin, mobilise les préjugés, amorce la dynamique transférentielle, provoque – ou pas – les résonances, et ouvre ou ferme les portes d’une possible rencontre. Malgré toute l’importance de ce premier instant qui balisera la rencontre, l’accueil fait relativement peu l’objet d’études approfondies. Notre recherche part de la question suivante : « Qu’est-ce qu’accueillir dans le champ de la santé mentale ? ». Elle vise à proposer une conceptualisation en explorant le sens donné par des professionnels au sein de services d’urgences psychiatriques. L’analyse par théorisation enracinée (Glaser et Strauss, 1967) a permis de dégager quatre catégories conceptuelles : (1) processus singulier ; (2) intentionnalité ; (3) entre je(u) ; (4) ritualisation de l’accueil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".