Convolutional Neural Network Approach for Elbow Torque Estimation during Quasi-dynamic and Dynamic Contractions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate torque estimation during dynamic conditions is challenging, yet an important problem for many applications such as robotics, prosthesis control, and clinical diagnostics. Our objective is to accurately estimate the torque generated at the elbow during flexion and extension, under quasi-dynamic and dynamic conditions. High-density surface electromyogram (HD-EMG) signals, acquired from the long head and short head of biceps brachii, brachioradialis, and triceps brachii of five participants are used to estimate the torque generated at the elbow, using a convolutional neural network (CNN). We hypothesise that incorporating the mechanical information recorded by the biodex machine, i.e., position and velocity, can improve the model performance. To investigate the effects of the added data modalities on the model accuracy, models are constructed that combine EMG and position, as well as EMG with both position and velocity. R2values are improved by 2.35%, 37.50%, and 16.67%, when position and EMG are used as inputs to the CNN models, for isotonic, isokinetic, and dynamic cases, respectively compared to using only EMG. The model performances improves further by 2.29%, 12.12%, and 20.50% for isotonic, isokinetic, and dynamic conditions, when velocity is added with the EMG and position data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".