Discrete phase space and continuous time relativistic quantum mechanics II: Peano circles, hyper-tori phase cells, and fiber bundles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discrete phase space and continuous time representation of relativistic quantum mechanics are further investigated here as a continuation of paper I.1 The main mathematical construct used here will be that of an area filling Peano curve. We show that the limit of a sequence of a class of Peano curves is a Peano circle denoted as [Formula: see text], a circle of radius [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text]. We interpret this two-dimensional (2D) Peano circle in our framework as a phase cell inside our 2D discrete phase plane. We postulate that a first quantized Planck oscillator, being very light, and small beyond current experimental detection, occupies this phase cell [Formula: see text]. The time evolution of this Peano circle sweeps out a 2D vertical cylinder analogous to the worldsheet of string theory. Extending this to 3D space, we introduce a [Formula: see text]-dimensional phase space hyper-tori [Formula: see text] as the appropriate phase cell in the physical dimensional discrete phase space. A geometric interpretation of this structure in state space is given in terms of product fiber bundles. We also study free scalar Bosons in the background [Formula: see text]-dimensional discrete phase space and continuous time state space using the relativistic partial difference-differential Klein–Gordon equation. The second quantized field quanta of this system can cohabit with the tiny Planck oscillators inside the [Formula: see text] phase cells for eternity. Finally, a generalized free second quantized Klein–Gordon equation in a higher [Formula: see text]-dimensional discrete state space is explored. The resulting discrete phase space dimension is compared to the significant spatial dimensions of some of the popular models of string theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".