Pratiques enseignantes mises en œuvre en contexte de classe autochtone universitaire : analyse du discours du corps enseignant d’une université québécoise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche qualitative phénoménologique réalisée auprès de dix membres du corps enseignant de l’Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue s’intéresse aux pratiques enseignantes utilisées pour favoriser la réussite des étudiants autochtones. Il résulte de l’analyse thématique du discours des participants, collecté par des entrevues semi-dirigées, que leurs choix pédagogiques ne dépendent pas de la présence ou non d’étudiants autochtones dans le groupe. Cette étude révèle également que, dans ce contexte, les participants adaptent le contenu de leurs cours et adoptent une attitude d’écoute, de flexibilité, d’ouverture et de respect. Cela témoigne des efforts individuels déployés pour rendre l’enseignement universitaire plus inclusif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".