El descubrimiento del neoliberalismo: El traductor de Salvador Benesdra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pesar de que el neoliberalismo ha sido el sistema económico dominante y la ideología hegemónica en América Latina durante los últimos cuarenta años, son pocos los estudios que abordan su relación con la literatura latinoamericana; de allí el interés de estudiar El traductor de Salvador Benesdra. Para tal fin, el análisis se apoya en los críticos que han historiado las reformas neoliberales (Harvey, Escalante Gonzalbo), en los que han cuestionado sus fundamentos ideológicos (Ahmed, Laval y Dardot) y, también, en los que se han ocupado de la obra de Benesdra (Avaro, Vitagliano). El resultado es una lectura de cómo Benesdra, durante la década de 1990, realiza una representación del nuevo orden neoliberal en diferentes ámbitos sociales (el laboral, el afectivo, el político, el cultural) y una reflexión respecto a la crítica que articula sobre este tema. En última instancia, también se muestran los vasos comunicantes existentes entre el neoliberalismo y la literatura latinoamericana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".