MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200180524 · doi:10.26522/vp.v18i2.3519

Savoirs littéraires et arts narratifs autochtones. Introduction

2021· article· fr· W4200180524 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Isabella Huberman, Joëlle Papillon, Isabelle St-Amand

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix Plurielles · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesThe artsVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cette introduction sous forme de conversation, les coéditrices du dossier « Savoirs littéraires et arts narratifs autochtones » reviennent sur leurs parcours individuels avant d’aborder des questions qu’elles considèrent cruciales tel que le rôle des institutions et communautés littéraires dans le développement du champ des études autochtones, de même que celui des chercheur.e.s et des universités. Elles réfléchissent notamment à l’importance du positionnement et des relations de décentrements et de recentrements qui surgissent lorsque des chercheur.e.s non autochtones se penchent sur l’œuvre d’auteur.e.s des Premières Nations, que leur visée soit critique ou pédagogique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix PluriellesSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207