MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enabling Real-time Estimation of Borehole Parameters in Deep Drilling

2021· article· en· W4200181135 on OpenAlex
Shanti Swaroop Kandala, Roman Shor

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Sensors · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeDrillingTorqueMeasurement while drillingWork (physics)WellboreGeologyField (mathematics)Dynamical frictionEngineeringPetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, the evolution of friction factors across the depth of a horizontal wellbore, downhole rpm and downhole torque are obtained using a distributed drillstring model. The model has been field validated for the off-bottom dynamics and is used to estimate along-drillstring friction factors. This model was later extended to include a bit-rock interaction (BRI) law to obtain the downhole rpm and downhole torque while drilling and has been validated against the field data. The advantage of the model used in this work is that it employs an adaptive soft sensor, robust to capture the disturbances occurring at the downhole. Only the top-drive measurements are used to estimate friction factors (static and kinetic friction coefficients) and the downhole parameters using the soft sensor. Once the bit engages, the BRI takes precedence, and the model stops estimating the friction factors. The model is used to generate estimates for friction factors, the downhole rpm and BRI for a well located in North America. It was observed that in both the cases, the estimates match closely with that of the data considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it