MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data-driven technologies and artificial intelligence in circular economy and waste management systems: a review

2021· review· en· W4200184465 on OpenAlex
Faisal Shennib, Ketra Schmitt

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMunicipal Solid Waste Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircular economyScope (computer science)Domain (mathematical analysis)Data managementData-drivenSustainable developmentComputer scienceBusiness intelligenceKnowledge managementEngineering managementManagement scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sustainable waste management is an objective that is far from our current reach, requiring new paradigms of thought, policy, and technology to achieve. The explosion of new applications of data-driven technologies provides the opportunity to be applied to the challenges of waste management and moving towards circular economy. This paper reviews a broad scope of current applications of data-driven and artificial intelligence in the domain of waste management, as collected from journals, reports, and a survey of business practices. We observed that few existing applications aim to make waste data openly available. Based on this gap, we propose novel areas for research and development to assess the potential of collaborative, open, data- driven circular economy initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementFrench-language works237,207