MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contaminación del aire por partículas sedimentables en domicilios en la zona urbana de la Provincia de Leoncio Prado, Departamento de Huánuco

2021· article· es· W4200188892 on OpenAlexaff
Kheffinir Livia, Casiano Aguirre, Jorge Pinna Cabrejos, Reiner Reátegui

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Científica Pakamuros · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPublic Health and Environmental Issues
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la contaminación del aire por partículas sedimentables en domicilios en la zona urbana de la Provincia de Leoncio Prado, Departamento de Huánuco. El tipo de estudio fue transversal y de nivel descriptivo, la muestra estuvo conformada por 12 zonas de monitoreo. Para el diseño del soporte de placas receptoras, la recolección de muestras y cálculos de la concentración de partículas sedimentables se utilizó los procedimientos del Boletín Oficial del Estado de 1976. Los resultados indican que para la zona de la Av. Amazonas fue de 0.372 mg/cm2/mes, Jr. Julio Burga 0.384 mg/cm2/mes, Av. Raymondi 0.430 mg/cm2/mes, Naranjillo Centro 0.478 mg/cm2/mes, Electrocentro 0.633 mg/cm2/mes, Naranjillo Entrada 0.705 mg/cm2/mes, Afilador 0.722 mg/cm2/mes, Av. Raymondi 0.955 mg/cm2/mes, Brisas del Huallaga 0.966 mg/cm2/mes, Castillo Grande Entrada 0.989 mg/cm2/mes, Supte San Jorge 1.018 mg/cm2/mes y Castillo Grande Centro 1.148 mg/cm2/mes. En conclusión, existió 8 zonas de monitoreo que excedieron los Límites Máximos Permisibles (LMP) de 0.5 mg/cm2/mes establecidas por la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Científica PakamurosSame topicPublic Health and Environmental IssuesFrench-language works237,207