Brønsted acidic ionic liquid‐catalyzed and ultrasound‐promoted transesterification of fish oil with ethanol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Four typical Brønsted acidic ionic liquids (BILs) and concentrated sulphuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) were used to catalyze the transesterification of fish oil with ethanol to produce fatty acid ethyl ester (FAEE) in this work. The experimental results show that the imidazole BILs lead to fewer side reactions and higher product quality than H 2 SO 4 . Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations indicate that [PSMim][HSO 4 ] molecules can be enriched at the interface and enhance the contact of eicosapentaenoic acid triglyceride (EPATG, a typical component of fish oil) and ethanol. And ester groups of EPATG tend to expose more to ethanol in the BILs system, which facilitates the occurrence of transesterification. However, H 2 SO 4 has no positive effect on the distribution of the two reactants. For the transesterification, the interfacial property affects the catalytic activity a lot, instead of catalyst acidity. Also, the reaction rate is accelerated, obviously, by ultrasound‐led liquid–liquid phase emulsification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".