MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200198268 · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800308

Editorial: COVID-19 and Existential Positive Psychology (PP2.0): The New Science of Self-Transcendence

2021· editorial· en· W4200198268 on OpenAlexaff
Paul T. P. Wong, Claude‐Hélène Mayer, Gökmen Arslan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychology · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyExistentialismCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Transcendence (philosophy)Psychoanalysis2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Psychology of sciencePsychotherapistSocial psychologyEpistemologyPhilosophyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EDITORIAL article Front. Psychol., 08 December 2021Sec. Personality and Social Psychology https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800308

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychologySame topicPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207