The intrarenal renin-angiotensin system in hypertension: Insights from mathematical modelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a pivotal role in the maintenance of volume homeostasis and blood pressure. In addition to the well-studied systemic RAS, local RAS have been documented in various tissues, including the kidney. Given the role of the intrarenal RAS in the pathogenesis of hypertension, a role established via various pharmacologic and genetic studies, substantial efforts have been made to unravel the processes that govern intrarenal RAS activity. In particular, several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the rise in intrarenal angiotensin II (Ang II) that accompanies Ang II infusion, including increased angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R)-mediated uptake of Ang II and enhanced intrarenal Ang II production. However, experimentally isolating their contribution to the intrarenal accumulation of Ang II in Ang II–induced hypertension is challenging, given that they are fundamentally connected. Computational modelling is advantageous because the feedback underlying each mechanism can removed and the effect on intrarenal Ang II can be studied. In this work, the mechanisms governing the intrarenal accumulation of Ang II during Ang II infusion experiments are delineated and the role of the intrarenal RAS in Ang II-induced hypertension is studied. To accomplish this, a compartmental ODE model of the systemic and intrarenal RAS is developed and Ang II infusion experiments are simulated. Simulations indicate that AT1Rmediated uptake of Ang II is the primary mechanism by which Ang II accumulates in the kidney during Ang II infusion. Enhanced local Ang II production is unnecessary. The results demonstrate the role of the intrarenal RAS in the pathogenesis of Ang II-induced hypertension and consequently, clinical hypertension associated with an overactive RAS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".