MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4200206380 · doi:10.5194/essd-2021-423

Streamflow and weather conditions of seven small coastal watersheds, British Columbia, Canada, 2013–2019

2021· preprint· en· W4200206380 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Maartje C. Korver, Emily Haughton, William C. Floyd, Ian Giesbrecht

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityMinistry of ForestsVancouver Island UniversityMcGill UniversityTula Foundation
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaMinistry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource OperationsTula Foundation
KeywordsStreamflowHydrometeorologyEnvironmental scienceSurface runoffWatershedHydrology (agriculture)PrecipitationBaseflowDrainage basinClimatologyGeographyMeteorologyGeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Hydrometeorological observations of small watersheds of the northeast Pacific coastal temperate rainforest (NPCTR) of North America are important to understand land to ocean ecological connections and to provide the scientific basis for regional environmental management decisions. The Hakai Institute operates a densely networked and long-term hydrometeorological monitoring observatory, that fills a spatial data gap in the remote and sparsely gauged outer coast of the NPCTR. Here we present the first five water years (October 2013–October 2019) of hourly streamflow and weather data from seven small (< 13 km2), coastal watersheds. Average yearly rainfall was 3267 mm, resulting in 2317 mm of runoff and 0.1087 km3 of freshwater exports from all seven watersheds per year. However, rainfall and runoff were highly variable depending on location and elevation. The seven watersheds have rainfall-dominated (pluvial) streamflow regimes, streamflow responses are rapid and most water exports are driven by high-intensity fall and winter storm events. Measuring rainfall and streamflow in remote and topographically complex rainforest environments is challenging, hence advanced and novel automated measurement methods were used. These methods, specifically for stream flow measurement allowed us to quantify uncertainty and identify key sources of error, which varied by gauging location. Links to the complete dataset, watershed delineations with metrics, and calculation scripts can be found in Sect. 6 and 7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→