Single-cell profiling of healthy human kidney reveals features of sex-based transcriptional programs and tissue-specific immunity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Maintaining organ homeostasis requires complex functional synergy between distinct cell types, a snapshot of which is glimpsed through the simultaneously broad and granular analysis provided by single-cell atlases. Knowledge of the transcriptional programs underpinning the complex and specialized functions of human kidney cell populations at homeostasis is limited by difficulty accessing healthy, fresh tissue. Here, we present a single-cell perspective of healthy human kidney from 19 living donors, with equal contribution from males and females, profiling the transcriptome of 27677 high-quality cells to map healthy kidney at high resolution. Our sex-balanced dataset revealed sex-based differences in gene expression within proximal tubular cells, specifically, increased anti-oxidant metallothionein genes in females and the predominance of aerobic metabolism-related genes in males. Functional differences in metabolism were confirmed between male and female proximal tubular cells, with male cells exhibiting higher oxidative phosphorylation and higher levels of energy precursor metabolites. Within the immune niche, we identified kidney-specific lymphocyte populations with unique transcriptional profiles indicative of kidney-adapted functions and validated findings by flow cytometry. We observed significant heterogeneity in resident myeloid populations and identified an MRC1 + LYVE1 + FOLR2 + C1QC + population as the predominant myeloid population in healthy kidney. This study provides a detailed cellular map of healthy human kidney, revealing novel insights into the complexity of renal parenchymal cells and kidney-resident immune populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".