MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long-term Physical Exercise Improves Finger Tapping of Patients withAlzheimer's Disease

2021· article· en· W4200210507 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Linlin Zhao, Guanghua Liu, Lingli Zhang, Yuxiang Du, Lei Le, Xiaojing Zhang, Yilong Zhao, Deng Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Alzheimer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShanghai Municipal Health Bureau
KeywordsFinger tappingMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentDiseasePhysical therapyCognitive impairmentPhysical exerciseInternal medicineAudiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease that has been characterized by progressive development of long onset early disease with complicated etiology and may cause memory loss, cognitive impairment, and behavioral changes. Physical exercise may play a preventive role in AD. In the present study, we investigated the impact of longer-term physical exercise on the finger tapping of AD patients by comparing the finger tapping of AD patients and healthy controls. METHODS: In this study, 140 subjects aged ≥ 60 years were enrolled. Group A consisted of 70 subjects (27 males and 43 females) without exercise habits who were selected from Yangpu District (Shanghai, China). Group B consisted of 70 subjects (27 males and 43 females) who were selected from Minxing District (Shanghai, China). All the subjects were right-handed as well. The subjects' data, including subjects' age, weight, height, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and finger tapping frequency, were measured. RESULTS: The subjects were matched in age, weight, and height. The AD subjects' MoCA and MMSE scores were noticeably lower than healthy subjects' scores (P<0.001); besides, AD patients with exercise had significantly lower MoCA and MMSE scores than healthy controls with exercise (P<0.001). The finger tapping of AD subjects' left hands was significantly lower than that of healthy subjects without AD (P<0.01), and AD subjects with exercise tapped significantly slower with their left hand than healthy subjects with exercise (P<0.01). Meanwhile, AD subjects with exercise tapped significantly faster with the left hand than AD subjects (P<0.05). The right hands of AD subjects tapped remarkably less than healthy subjects (P<0.01) with or without exercise. Meanwhile, subjects with exercise tapped significantly faster with their right hand than healthy subjects (P<0.05), and AD subjects with exercise tapped significantly faster with their right hand than AD subjects (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Long-term physical exercises can improve finger tapping frequency, especially in patients with AD. Finger tapping frequency may be used as an index to monitor the cognitive decline in ageing AD patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Alzheimer ResearchSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207