MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200213161 · doi:10.1002/mp.15432

Automated 3D U‐net based segmentation of neonatal cerebral ventricles from 3D ultrasound images

2021· article· en· W4200213161 on OpenAlexaff
Zachary Szentimrey, Sandrine de Ribaupierre, Aaron Fenster, Eranga Ukwatta

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLateral ventriclesSegmentationCerebral ventricle3D ultrasoundVentricleArtificial intelligenceUltrasoundComputer scienceMedicineRadiologyAnatomyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Intraventricular hemorrhaging (IVH) within cerebral lateral ventricles affects 20-30% of very low birth weight infants (<1500 g). As the ventricles increase in size, the intracranial pressure increases, leading to post-hemorrhagic ventricle dilatation (PHVD), an abnormal enlargement of the head. The most widely used imaging tool for measuring IVH and PHVD is cranial two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US). Estimating volumetric changes over time with 2D US is unreliable due to high user variability when locating the same anatomical location at different scanning sessions. Compared to 2D US, three-dimensional (3D) US is more sensitive to volumetric changes in the ventricles and does not suffer from variability in slice acquisition. However, 3D US images require segmentation of the ventricular surface, which is tedious and time-consuming when done manually. PURPOSE: A fast, automated ventricle segmentation method for 3D US would provide quantitative information in a timely manner when monitoring IVH and PHVD in pre-term neonates. To this end, we developed a fast and fully automated segmentation method to segment neonatal cerebral lateral ventricles from 3D US images using deep learning. METHODS: Our method consists of a 3D U-Net ensemble model composed of three U-Net variants, each highlighting various aspects of the segmentation task such as the shape and boundary of the ventricles. The ensemble is made of a U-Net++, attention U-Net, and U-Net with a deep learning-based shape prior combined using a mean voting strategy. We used a dataset consisting of 190 3D US images, which was separated into two subsets, one set of 87 images contained both ventricles, and one set of 103 images contained only one ventricle (caused by limited field-of-view during acquisition). We conducted fivefold cross-validation to evaluate the performance of the models on a larger amount of test data; 165 test images of which 75 have two ventricles (two-ventricle images) and 90 have one ventricle (one-ventricle images). We compared these results to each stand-alone model and to previous works including, 2D multiplane U-Net and 2D SegNet models. RESULTS: , and 1.37 ± 1.70 mm, respectively. Compared to alternatives, the proposed ensemble yielded a higher accuracy in segmentation on both test data sets. Our method required approximately 5 s to segment one image and was substantially faster than the state-of-the-art conventional methods. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the state-of-the-art non-deep learning methods, our method based on deep learning was more efficient in segmenting neonatal cerebral lateral ventricles from 3D US images with comparable or better DSC, VD, and MAD performance. Our dataset was the largest to date (190 images) for this segmentation problem and the first to segment images that show only one lateral cerebral ventricle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207