Masculinisme, changement climatique et catastrophes produites par les hommes. Vers une réponse environnementale proféministe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore le caractère genré des causes et des réponses aux événements climatiques dans le monde, en prenant comme toile de fond le changement climatique induit par les humains et l’augmentation des catastrophes naturelles liées au climat. Il soutient les arguments féministes de longue date selon lesquels les politiques environnementales progressistes ne sont pas exemptes de masculinité hégémonique et de masculinisme. Loin de promouvoir les « masculinités écologiques », il soutient que les hommes doivent être prêts à renoncer à leurs privilèges masculins et à découvrir de nouveaux modes de relation entre eux ainsi qu’avec les femmes et avec la nature. Pour s’attaquer aux causes sociales et humaines du changement climatique, il faudra alors remettre en question les modèles de masculinité hégémonique qui promeuvent des formes technocratiques et managériales de contrôle de la nature et refusent de reconnaître la vulnérabilité humaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".