New transform to project axisymmetric deflection fields along arbitrary rays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Axisymmetric tomography is used to extract quantitative information from line-of-sight measurements of gas flow and combustion fields. For instance, background-oriented schlieren (BOS) measurements are typically inverted by tomographic reconstruction to estimate the density field of a high-speed or high-temperature flow. Conventional reconstruction algorithms are based on the inverse Abel transform, which assumes that rays are parallel throughout the target object. However, camera rays are not parallel, and this discrepancy can result in significant errors in many practical imaging scenarios. We present a generalization of the Abel transform for use in tomographic reconstruction of light-ray deflections through an axisymmetric target. The new transform models the exact path of camera rays instead of assuming parallel paths, thereby improving the accuracy of estimates. We demonstrate our approach with a simulated BOS scenario in which we reconstruct noisy synthetic deflection data across a range of camera positions. Results are compared to state-of-the-art Abel-based algorithms. Reconstructions computed using the new transform are consistently more stable and accurate than conventional reconstructions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".