Physics-based neural networks for simulation and synthesis of cyclic adsorption processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A computationally faster and reliable modelling approach called a physics-based artificial neural network framework for adsorption and chromatography emulation (PANACHE) is developed. PANACHE uses deep neural networks for cycle synthesis and simulation of cyclic adsorption processes. The proposed approach focuses on learning the underlying governing partial differential equations in the form of a physics-constrained loss function to simulate adsorption processes accurately. The methodology developed herein does not require any system-specific inputs such as isotherm parameters. Accordingly, unique neural network models were built to fully predict the column dynamics of different constituent steps based on unique boundary conditions that are typically encountered in adsorption processes. The trained neural network model for each constituent step aims to predict the entire spatiotemporal solutions of different state variables by obeying the underlying physical laws. The proposed approach is tested by constructing and simulating four different vacuum swing adsorption cycles for post-combustion CO2 capture without retraining the neural network models. For each cycle, 50 simulations, each corresponding to a unique set of operating conditions, are carried out until the cyclic-steady state. The results demonstrated that the purity and recovery calculated from the neural network-based simulations are within 2.5% of the detailed model's predictions. PANACHE reduced computational times by 100 times while maintaining similar accuracy of the detailed model simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".