MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4200241531 · doi:10.1101/2021.12.05.21267323

Mitochondria-targeted antioxidant supplementation augments acute exercise-induced increases in muscle PGC1α mRNA and improves training-induced increases in peak power independent of mitochondrial content and function in untrained middle-aged men

2021· preprint· en· W4200241531 on OpenAlexaff
Sophie C. Broome, Toan Pham, Andrea Braakhuis, Ravi Narang, H. W. Wang, Anthony J. Hickey, Cameron J. Mitchell, Troy L. Merry

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCallaghan Innovation
KeywordsMitochondrial biogenesisSkeletal muscleHigh-intensity interval trainingInterval trainingInternal medicineMedicinePlaceboEndocrinologyEndurance trainingMitochondrionVastus lateralis muscleAerobic exercisePhysical therapyBiologyBiochemistryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The role of mitochondrial ROS production and signalling in muscle adaptations to exercise training has not been explored in detail. Here we investigated the effect of supplementation with the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ on a) the skeletal muscle mitochondrial and antioxidant gene transcriptional response to acute high-intensity exercise and b) skeletal muscle mitochondrial content and function following exercise training. In a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design study, 23 untrained men (age: 44 ± 7 years, VO 2peak : 39.6 ± 7.9 ml/kg/min) were randomised to receive either MitoQ (20 mg/d) or a placebo for 10 days before completing a bout of high-intensity interval exercise (cycle ergometer, 10 × 60 s at VO 2peak workload with 75 s rest). Blood samples and vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were collected before exercise and immediately and 3 hours after exercise. Participants then completed high-intensity interval training (HIIT; 3 sessions per week for 3 weeks) and another blood sample and muscle biopsy were collected. MitoQ supplementation augmented acute exercise-induced increases in skeletal muscle mRNA expression of the major regulator of proteins involved in mitochondrial biogenesis peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC1-α). Despite this, training-induced increases in skeletal muscle mitochondrial content were unaffected by MitoQ supplementation. HIIT-induced increases in VO 2peak and 20 km time trial performance were also unaffected by MitoQ while MitoQ augmented training-induced increases in peak power achieved during the VO 2peak test. These data suggest that MitoQ supplementation enhances the effect of training on peak power, which may be related to the augmentation of skeletal muscle PGC1α expression following acute exercise. However, this effect does not appear to be related to an effect of MitoQ supplementation on HIIT-induced mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle and may therefore be the result of other adaptations mediated by PGC1α.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→