Voyager pour apprendre : les Canadiens reçus docteurs en médecine à Paris au XIX<sup>e</sup> siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treize Canadiens sont reçus docteurs à la Faculté de médecine de Paris entre 1822 et 1905. Leurs séjours en France jouent un rôle déterminant dans certaines tendances majeures de l’histoire canadienne du XIXe siècle, notamment la formation d’une bourgeoisie professionnelle canadienne-française, l’officialisation des liens diplomatiques entre le Canada et la France, l’essor de la bactériologie en Amérique et la montée du nationalisme canadien-français au tournant du XXe siècle. Grâce à des sources inédites, principalement les dossiers étudiants et les thèses doctorales recueillis dans le fichier Pierre Moulinier de la Bibliothèque Interuniversitaire de Santé de l’Université Paris-Descartes, cet article retrace les parcours de ces docteurs canadiens. En s’attardant à leurs séjours à Paris, il examine les effets sur la profession médicale des rapports entre une ancienne colonie d’Amérique du Nord et sa première capitale impériale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".