Optimizing the Proton Conductivity with the Isokinetic Temperature in Perovskite‐Type Proton Conductors According to Meyer–Neldel Rule
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Perovskite‐type metal oxides such as Y‐doped BaMO 3 (M = Zr/Ce) have drawn considerable attention as proton‐conducting electrolytes for intermediate temperature ceramic electrochemical cells. Improving the proton conductivity at lower temperatures requires a comprehensive understanding of the proton conduction mechanism. By applying high pressure or varying the Ce content of Y‐doped BaMO 3 , it is demonstrated that the proton conductivity follows the Meyer–Neldel rule (MNR) well. In the Arrhenius plot, the conductivities intersect at an isokinetic temperature, where the proton conductivity is independent of activation energy. Considering the relationship between isokinetic temperature and lattice vibration frequency, a high isokinetic temperature is observed in materials with stiff lattices, consisting of light atoms and small MO bond length. Based on consideration of the MNR, it is suggested that the enhancement of proton conductivity at low temperature can be well achieved by tuning lattice vibration frequency toward a desired isokinetic temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".