MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200254970 · doi:10.1649/0010-065x-75.4.774

Faunistic Survey of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera: Adephaga) from Far North Ontario, Canada

2021· article· en· W4200254970 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sherri L. DeGasparro, Yves Alarie, David Beresford

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Coleopterists Bulletin · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolarcticDytiscidaeNearctic ecozoneFaunaGeographyEcologyBorealBiologyTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we report on the diversity and distribution of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera: Adephaga) collected in Far North Ontario, Canada during the years 2009 to 2014. A total of 387 individuals from 34 species and 14 genera were collected, which represent 20.9% of the known Ontario fauna. Of these, 24 species are Nearctic (70.6%) and 10 species Holarctic (29.4%). Most species have a transcontinental distribution in Canada and are characteristic of the Boreal Ecozone. Two species, Hygrotus unguicularis (Crotch, 1874) and Nebrioporus depressus (Fabricius, 1775), are recorded in Ontario for the first time. The collection of black-bodied Nebrioporus macronychus (Short and Angus, 1992) in this study is a unique feature amongst North American species of Nebrioporus Régimbart, 1906.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Coleopterists BulletinSame topicBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207