MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200260643 · doi:10.1213/xaa.0000000000001532

Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in the Intensive Care Unit: A Case Report of 2 Patients

2021· article· en· W4200260643 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueA&A Practice · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de MontréalUniversité LavalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensive care unitHemodynamicsInotropeIntensive careVentricular outflow tract obstructionEtiologyVentricular outflow tractRight heart

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (RVOTO) is a rare cause of hemodynamic instability in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery. We report the first cases of RVOTO diagnosed in the ICU using continuous right ventricular pressure waveform monitoring. Our 2 cases reflect both mechanical and dynamic causes of obstruction, each of which require different approaches to treatment. Inotrope use can exacerbate RVOTO caused by dynamic etiology, whereas surgery is usually the treatment of choice for mechanical obstructions. Inability to recognize RVOTO or the correct etiology can lead to hemodynamic compromise and poor outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueA&A PracticeSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207