MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rigid Body Localization and Environment Sensing with 5G Millimeter Wave MIMO

2021· article· en· W4200263087 on OpenAlexaff
Biwei Li, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE 94th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Fall) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNon-line-of-sight propagationComputer scienceSingular value decompositionSpecular reflectionRigid bodyComputer visionPosition (finance)Channel (broadcasting)Compressed sensingArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmWirelessTelecommunicationsPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurately localizing a moving target (MT) assisted with 5G in indoor environment could enable a wide variety of new applications. However, an MT in 3-dimensional space is usually considered as a rigid body with six degrees of freedom for industrial applications. Furthermore, the radio-based localization suffers from the non-line-of-sight (NLOS) condition in indoor scenes due to the uncertain environments, which proves to be a main source of location error. To improve the rigid body localization accuracy as well as unravel useful environmental information from the received signals, a novel rigid body localization and environment sensing scheme is proposed in this paper. The angle of arrivals (AOAs) derived from 5G channel estimation combined with singular value decomposition (SVD) method is adopted to achieve rigid body position and orientation estimation. Also, we propose a reflection point estimation method by leveraging a hierarchical iterative maximum likelihood-DCS-SOMP (HIML-DCS-SOMP) algorithm to extract the angular information of the single-bounce specular reflections. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme can achieve high accuracy rigid body localization and sketch the environment information in indoor scene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE 94th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Fall)Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207