Prediction of anemia on enhanced computed tomography of the thorax using virtual non-contrast reconstructions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: To determine if anemia can be predicted on enhanced computed tomography (CT) examinations of the thorax using virtual non-contrast (VNC) images, in order to support clinicians especially in diagnosing primary asymptomatic patients in daily routine.In this monocentric study, 100 consecutive patients (50 with proven anemia), who underwent a contrast-enhanced CT examination of the thorax due to various indications were included. Attenuation was measured in the descending thoracic aorta, the intraventricular septum, and the left ventricle cavity both in the conventional contrast-enhanced and in the VNC images.Two experienced radiologists annotated the delineation of a dense interventricular septum or a hyperattenuating aortic wall sign for all patients.Hemoglobin levels were then correlated with the measured attenuation values, as well as the visualization of the aortic wall or interventricular septum.Good correlation was shown between hemoglobin levels and CT attenuation values of the left ventricular cavity (r = .59), aorta (r = .56), and ratio between left ventricular cavity and the intraventricular septum (r = .57). Receiver operating characteristic curve revealed ≤ 36.5 hounsfield units (left ventricular cavity) as the threshold for diagnosing anemia. Predicting anemia by visualization of a hyperattenuating aortic wall or a dense interventricular septum yielded a specificity of 98% and 92%, respectively.Predicting anemia on enhanced CT examinations using VNC is feasible. A threshold value of ≤ 36.5 hounsfield units (left ventricular cavity) best defines anemia. Aortic wall or interventricular septum visualization on VNC is a specific anemia indicator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".