MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Structural Behavior of Novel Precast TL-5 Bridge Barriers Using Ultrahigh-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concretes

2021· article· en· W4200294482 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bridge Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation Safety and Impact Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concreteStructural engineeringMaterials scienceSlabFailure mode and effects analysisConnection (principal bundle)Composite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimental testing and numerical modeling were performed on novel precast TL-5 barriers subjected to centered and eccentric loadings in a quasi-static mode. The mechanical behavior of two precast barrier configurations was analyzed and compared: a hybrid barrier including a normal strength concrete (NSC) core and a ultrahigh performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) shell with a UHPFRC barrier–slab connection, and a precast version of a cast-in-place QMT301 barrier made of NSC with a UHPFRC barrier–slab connection. Laboratory experiments on 2-m precast barriers under eccentric loading applied on 0.7 m demonstrated a shear failure in the upper portion of the hybrid and QMT barriers while the UHPFRC connection recess remained elastic, as observed in the cast-in-place solution. The longitudinal connection between precast barriers increased the maximal capacity under eccentric loading at the connected end. Numerical models were carried out on 2–6 -m precast barriers, under centered and eccentric loading, with 0.7 and 2.4 m loading lengths. Models showed the critical effects of shorter barrier length (2 m), shorter loading length (0.7), and eccentric loading as these factors significantly reduce the ultimate capacity of the precast barrier. Models validated with experiments confirmed that the load-carrying capacities of the developed precast TL-5 hybrid and QMT301 barriers surpass the minimum CSA and AASHTO design load requirements when considering 4-m barrier modules loaded on 2.4 m, whether or not there is a longitudinal connection and whether the loading is centered or eccentric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it