MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200298812 · doi:10.2217/3dp-2021-0018

MeTiS: A Modular Pipeline for Extracting 3D-Printable Brain-Surface Models from Conventional and Ultra-High Field MRI

2021· article· en· W4200298812 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonathan Lee, Gary Hoang, Chia-Shang Liu, Mark S. Shiroishi, Alexander Lerner, Tyler Ard, Vishal Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of 3D Printing in Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Computer scienceModular designSoftwareWorkflowVisualizationPlug-inArtificial intelligenceNeuroimagingSoftware engineeringData miningDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: To develop a modular software pipeline for robustly extracting 3D brain-surface models from MRIs for visualization or printing. No other end-to-end pipeline specialized for neuroimaging does this directly with an interchangeable combination of methods. Materials & methods: A software application was developed to dynamically generate Nipype workflows using interfaces from the Analysis of Functional NeuroImages, Advanced Normalization Tools, FreeSurfer, BrainSuite, Nighres and the FMRIB Software Library suites. The application was deployed for public use via the LONI pipeline environment. Results: In a small, head-to-head comparison test, a pipeline using FreeSurfer for both the skull stripping and cortical-mesh extraction stages earned the highest subjective quality scores. Conclusion: We have deployed a publicly available and modular software tool for extracting 3D models from brain MRIs to use in medical education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of 3D Printing in MedicineSame topicAnatomy and Medical TechnologyFrench-language works237,207