MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

IoT-based Platform for an Air-to-Air Heat Exchanger Evaluation

2021· article· en· W4200305005 on OpenAlexaffabout
Haïfa Souifi, Yassine Bouslimani, Mohsen Ghribi

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE 3rd Eurasia Conference on IOT, Communication and Engineering (ECICE) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat exchangerIndoor air qualityEnvironmental scienceHeat recovery ventilationVentilation (architecture)Software deploymentComputer scienceEnergy consumptionInternet of ThingsThermal comfortAutomotive engineeringReal-time computingProcess engineeringArchitectural engineeringSimulationEmbedded systemMeteorologyEngineeringEnvironmental engineeringMechanical engineeringOperating systemElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applying to many commercial and residential applications, air-to-air heat/energy exchangers are extensively considered as one of the promising technologies for improving indoor air quality (IAQ), providing thermal comfort, and dwindling energy consumption costs as well. The present paper proposes an IoT-based platform to experimentally assess the performances of a heat recovery ventilator (HRV) system in terms of heat recovery and IAQ enhancement. To gather and log measurements, the developed IoT platform is integrated into the mechanical ventilation system without affecting its operation modes. For more than 12 months, the proposed IoT approach successfully collected and sent every 60 s, real-time measurements related to the indoor and outdoor air quality, with a focus on TVOC and CO <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> , and the related temperature, humidity, and pressure used to assess the system’s sensible heat recovery potential. Results from a real environment located in New Brunswick, Canada are presented, and the system performances are evaluated under extreme weather conditions. The developed IoT platform was flexible in terms of deployment and data exchange and proved to be efficient in collecting real-time data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE 3rd Eurasia Conference on IOT, Communication and Engineering (ECICE)Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207