MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200305255 · doi:10.31590/ejosat.980786

Comparative Evaluation of Solar Houses Applied in Turkey

2021· article· en· W4200305255 on OpenAlex
Çiğdem Belgin Dikmen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Science and Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiEge ÜniversitesiUniversity of TorontoÇukurova Üniversitesi
KeywordsRenewable energyZero-energy buildingSolar energyLow-energy houseContext (archaeology)Solar air conditioningPassive solar building designScope (computer science)Architectural engineeringPhotovoltaic systemEnvironmental scienceEnergy conservationEngineeringEnvironmental economicsComputer scienceGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The construction sector consumes a significant portion of the energy resources irreversibly and harms the environment. Limited resources and emerging environmental problems have made it necessary to search for new energy resources in the world and in our country, and to use renewable energy sources, environmentally friendly and energy efficient building designs in the building sector. In this context, the issues of solar energy, which is one of the clean and renewable sources and the use of solar energy in buildings, have gained importance. Although Turkey is in advantageous position compared to European countries in terms of potential solar energy, solar energy is not sufficiently utilized in buildings and studies are limited to academic studies. Solar houses, which are built in Turkey in order to benefit from solar energy with active and passive methods in heating, cooling, lighting and ventilation of buildings, consist of single examples designed with different functions. The aim of this study is to emphasize the importance of the use of solar energy in buildings within the scope of renewable energy sources, to examine the solar houses applied in Turkey comparatively and to make suggestions for solar house design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it