MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4200305853 · doi:10.2118/205575-ms

Heavy Oil Polymer Pilot with Active Bottom Water Drive – A Success Story

2021· article· en· W4200305853 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. V. Dadlani, Gaurav Jain, Sabyasachi Saikia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelinePetroleum engineeringFlood mythEnvironmental scienceEnhanced oil recoveryEngineeringGeologyOceanographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bechraji is one of the major fields of heavy oil belt of Mehsana Asset in Western India. It contains heavy oil with average viscosity of ~270cp at reservoir temperature. During the early phase of production, high viscosity led to viscous fingering which resulted in sharp rise in field water cut to ~80%. Polymer flood in heavy oil has received significant attention after the numerous success across the globe namely, Marmul Oman, Bohai Bay offshore China and Pelican lake Canada fields. Screening studies were conducted followed by comprehensive laboratory evaluations of chemical flood potential which identified it as suitable process. Thus, a normal five spot pattern pilot testing was planned to understand the role of chemical EOR methods in the ultimate development strategy for the Bechraji. Comprehensive monitoring and quality control procedures were being followed to ensure smooth operations. Pressure surveys, tracer surveys, detailed produced fluid analyses and tests for monitoring the quality of injected fluids were all performed routinely. This paper deliberates the operational aspects of polymer flood, quality control and monitoring program followed, challenges faced and results of polymer flooding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques→French-language works237,207→