Fuerza muscular en la prevención de lesiones y el alta deportivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La producción de fuerza en el hombre es imprescindible para su desarrollo dentro del medio que le rodea y para la adaptación al mismo. En la realización del deporte profesional y amateur la fuerza constituye un componente a tomar en cuenta para el correcto desenvolvimiento del atleta, permite desarrollar el deporte con mejor nivel de competitividad y tiene un rol importante en la prevención de lesiones. Para este trabajo se estudia a atletas profesionales y amateurs que presentan lesiones en miembro inferior, valorando y comparando la fuerza bilateral por medio de la utilización de dinamómetro, para determinar la fuerza medida en kilogramos durante contracciones isométricas en duración de 5 segundos. Se determina que post lesión la fuerza muscular del lado afectado disminuye, produciendo una diferencia mayor al 15%, y a la vez se concluye que correcto plan de fortalecimiento permite disminuir la diferencia de fuerza y permite acondicionar al atleta para conceder el alta deportiva, lo que va a disminuir las posibilidades de una recidiva o lesiones desencadenadas por alteraciones o desequilibrios en la fuerza muscular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".