MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200314692 · doi:10.21037/gs-21-799

Bibliometric analysis of research on thyroid ultrasonography

2021· article· en· W4200314692 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Juan Su, Guanghui Gao, Hongxia Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueGland Surgery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBibliometricsMedicineThyroidCitationChinaWeb of scienceLibrary sciencePathologyPolitical scienceMeta-analysisComputer scienceInternal medicineLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The incidence of thyroid diseases has increased, which may be partly related to the widespread use of thyroid ultrasound resulting in a large number of asymptomatic thyroid nodules to be found. Research has found that many thyroid ultrasound examinations are completely avoidable. However, the purpose of the present study was to use bibliometrics to analyze the relevant research literature of thyroid ultrasound and understand the overall status of the current research in this field. Methods: We searched the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) database in the Web of Science Core Collection. Search terms were “ultrasonography” and “thyroid gland”. The date range for the document search was from 1900 to May 10, 2021. Export the full record of the search results and the references in txt. format, and use the CiteSpace software to analyze the annual publication of literatures, the distribution of countries and institutions where the literatures came from, the distribution of journals and authors. The keywords used in the literature were also analyzed. Results: A total of 1,241 publications were included in the results, and the frequency of citations was 27,149. The top 5 countries for the number of publications published were the USA, Turkey, Italy, South Korea, and China; the top 5 countries by centrality were the USA, Germany, Italy, Canada, and China. The number of institution-published papers was generally low, and the centrality score was low. Research in this field was relatively scattered among institutions and cooperation between institutions was few. There was little collaboration between authors from different institutions. The most cited authors were mainly from European and North American countries. Journals, such as Thyroid, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, and Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, had great influence in this field. Keyword analysis results showed that research is mainly focused on the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Conclusions: There was an increase in thyroid ultrasound research, but there was few cooperation exist between institutions. The main research direction was the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0940.265
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGland SurgerySame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207