MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200320193 · doi:10.5354/2735-7279.2021.65651

PAULO FREIRE Y LAS POLÍTICAS DE LA PEDAGOGÍA CRÍTICA: UN LEGADO DE LUCHA

2021· article· es· W4200320193 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Enfoques Educacionales · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Innovations and Technology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Freire es uno de los pocos escritores cuya obra trasciende el momento histórico en el que aparecieron sus aportes. Su obra va más allá de su tiempo y se traduce con más fuerza y relevancia para abordar el futuro. Su legado en el momento actual es profético e inestimable para navegar en un momento oscuro de la historia, un momento que apunta a una mezcla de esperanza y desesperación. Las crisis entrecruzadas de la economía, la salud, el cambio climático, la política, el racismo y la democracia parecen apocalípticas, especialmente con el ascenso de la extrema derecha y las versiones actualizadas de políticas fascistas que emergen en todo el mundo. ¿Qué papel podrían tener la pedagogía y la política de la esperanza de Paulo Freire en un momento en que en medio de una pandemia mundial se ha vuelto cada vez más difícil "no sentir que algo -quizás el mundo- se está acabando, mientras luchamos por comprender las disrupciones sin precedentes de nuestros ordenamientos sociales y nuestras vidas personales"?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it