PAULO FREIRE Y LAS POLÍTICAS DE LA PEDAGOGÍA CRÍTICA: UN LEGADO DE LUCHA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Freire es uno de los pocos escritores cuya obra trasciende el momento histórico en el que aparecieron sus aportes. Su obra va más allá de su tiempo y se traduce con más fuerza y relevancia para abordar el futuro. Su legado en el momento actual es profético e inestimable para navegar en un momento oscuro de la historia, un momento que apunta a una mezcla de esperanza y desesperación. Las crisis entrecruzadas de la economía, la salud, el cambio climático, la política, el racismo y la democracia parecen apocalípticas, especialmente con el ascenso de la extrema derecha y las versiones actualizadas de políticas fascistas que emergen en todo el mundo. ¿Qué papel podrían tener la pedagogía y la política de la esperanza de Paulo Freire en un momento en que en medio de una pandemia mundial se ha vuelto cada vez más difícil "no sentir que algo -quizás el mundo- se está acabando, mientras luchamos por comprender las disrupciones sin precedentes de nuestros ordenamientos sociales y nuestras vidas personales"?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".