MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200325632 · doi:10.3828/qs.2021.18

Lecture de la prédation sexuelle dans <i>La coupe vide</i> d’Adrienne Choquette

2021· article· fr· W4200325632 on OpenAlexaff
Ariane Gibeau

Bibliographic record

VenueQuebec Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article considère la parution de La coupe vide comme un jalon dans l’histoire des luttes contre les violences sexuelles en littérature québécoise. Dans ce roman structuré autour d’une agression sexuelle et d’une tentative de féminicide, Adrienne Choquette explore le système qui organise les relations sociales et sexuelles de manière mortifère. Il s’agit de comprendre quelles sont les stratégies narratives mises en place, dans le contexte littéraire des années 1940, pour dénoncer les mécanismes de pouvoir et de coercition menant à la mort symbolique des femmes. Deux stratégies particulières sont explorées: la prédation sérielle du corps des femmes et l’universalisation du désir de prédation. De manière oblique, Choquette parvient dans son roman à braquer l’objectif sur le caractère patriarcal des relations hommes/femmes et à préfigurer certaines revendications féministes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuebec StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207