Lecture de la prédation sexuelle dans <i>La coupe vide</i> d’Adrienne Choquette
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article considère la parution de La coupe vide comme un jalon dans l’histoire des luttes contre les violences sexuelles en littérature québécoise. Dans ce roman structuré autour d’une agression sexuelle et d’une tentative de féminicide, Adrienne Choquette explore le système qui organise les relations sociales et sexuelles de manière mortifère. Il s’agit de comprendre quelles sont les stratégies narratives mises en place, dans le contexte littéraire des années 1940, pour dénoncer les mécanismes de pouvoir et de coercition menant à la mort symbolique des femmes. Deux stratégies particulières sont explorées: la prédation sérielle du corps des femmes et l’universalisation du désir de prédation. De manière oblique, Choquette parvient dans son roman à braquer l’objectif sur le caractère patriarcal des relations hommes/femmes et à préfigurer certaines revendications féministes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".