MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200332889 · doi:10.1002/cben.202100025

Oil Cakes as Sustainable Agro‐Industrial Feedstock for Biocarbon Materials

2021· article· en· W4200332889 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Siva Sankari, Singaravelu Vivekanandhan, Manjusri Misra, Amar K. Mohanty

Bibliographic record

VenueChemBioEng Reviews · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiodiesel Production and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsUniversity Grants Commission of BangladeshUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsRaw materialBiocharEnvironmental scienceWaste managementCarbon fibersOil productionPulp and paper industryMaterials sciencePyrolysisPetroleum engineeringComposite numberEngineeringChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The demand for vegetable oil is increasing for both food and non‐food applications, which leads to the generation of a huge amount of oil cakes. The rising annual production requires alternative applications for sustainable operations of oil mills, especially those involved in non‐edible oil production. Hence, the value‐added uses of oil cakes such as environment remediation (metal absorption), composite fabrication (as fillers, reinforcements), nanoparticle synthesis (as reducing and stabilizing agent), and production of carbonaceous materials (as carbon source) were extensively explored in recent years. Among them, the thermochemical conversion of oil cakes into carbonaceous materials (biochar and activated carbon) received great interest as the demand for biocarbon materials increases exponentially. Oil cake‐derived biocarbon materials found a wide range of technological applications. With this perspective, recent developments in oil cake‐derived carbon materials and their diverse applications are reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemBioEng ReviewsSame topicBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207