Artificial Intelligence Aided Proxy Model for Water Front Tracking in Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Saturation mapping in fractured carbonate reservoirs is a major challenge for oil and gas companies. The fracture channels within the reservoir are the primary water conductors that shape water front patterns and cause uneven sweep efficiency. Flow simulation for fractured reservoirs is typically time-consuming due to the inherent high nonlinearity. A data-driven approach to capture the main flow patterns is quintessential for efficient optimization of reservoir performance and uncertainty quantification. We employ an artificial intelligence (AI) aided proxy modeling framework for waterfront tracking in complex fractured carbonate reservoirs. The framework utilizes deep neural networks and reduced-order modeling to achieve an efficient representation of the reservoir dynamics to track and determine the fluid flow patterns within the fracture network. The AI-proxy model is examined on a synthetic two-dimensional (2D) fractured carbonate reservoir model. Training dataset including saturation and pressure maps at a series of time steps is generated using a dual-porosity dual-permeability (DPDP) model. Experimental results indicate a robust performance of the AI-aided proxy model, which successfully reproduce the key flow patterns within the reservoir and achieve orders of shorter running time than the full-order reservoir simulation. This suggests the great potential of utilizing the AI-aided proxy model for heavy-simulation-based reservoir applications such as history matching, production optimization, and uncertainty assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".