The legal restructuring framework in Poland: Does it help indebted enterprises avoid bankruptcy?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of the article is to present the latest research regarding the usefulness of restructuring proceedings in Poland, which enterprises threatened with insolvency or already insolvent may use to avoid bankruptcy. Changes in the legal system in Poland in 2015 were ground‐breaking, as not only the bankruptcy law was amended, but also the legal system was enriched with a new Restructuring Law (in force from 2016). The contribution of this article is threefold. First, the specifics of the four types of restructuring proceedings and the main actions to be carried out during the proceedings are discussed. Second, an analysis of the phenomenon of enterprise restructuring in Poland has been conducted on the basis of statistical data published by the Ministry of Justice. Third, the effects of 533 restructuring proceedings opened against capital companies in the period 2016–2018 have been assessed. The results achieved have allowed for the formulation of initial conclusions on the usefulness of the legal debt restructuring framework in Poland for business entities experiencing temporary financial difficulties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it